Analysis of Arrester Usage as Over Voltage Protection at 150 kV Mantang Substation, Indonesia

Authors

  • Heru Muhtari Faculty of Engineering, Muhammadiyah University of Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Adel Salem Sultan Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Engineering Faculty, AL-Mergib University Al-Khoms, Libya
  • Ivan Pavkovic Elektrodalmacija Split, Trogir Plant, Croatia
  • Xianjie Feng Department of Architectural Engineering, Dongguan University of Technology, Dongguan, China
  • Shehab Abdulwadood Ali Department of Physics, College of Saber, University of Aden, Aden, Yemen
  • Neli Velikova Department of Electrical Power Engineering Technical University of Varna, Bulgaria
  • Yehia Sayed Mohamed Electrical Engineering Department, Minia University, Minia, Egypt

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59535/faase.v3i1.426

Keywords:

Lightning Arrester, Overvoltage Protection, Impulse Wave, ETAP Simulation, Transformer Safety

Abstract

Over time, various problems and disturbances can arise in the management of transmission and distribution systems, either from internal or external sources. One of the most significant external disturbances that can lead to equipment failure is a lightning strike, which causes a surge in overvoltage. A device commonly used to protect electrical systems from such disturbances is the lightning arrester. This study focuses on the 150 kV Embassuring Substation to analyze the ideal placement distance between the lightning arrester and the transformer, as well as to compare system behavior under normal and fault conditions. The research method involves analytical calculations, including the determination of maximum arrester distance, arriving voltage at the system, maximum transformer voltage, arrester rated voltage, lightning surge impedance, arrester discharge current, and arrester resistance. In addition, field data were simulated using ETAP software. The results show that the peak voltage caused by a lightning strike reaches 572 kV with a rise time of 0.4 µs. After 5 µs, the impulse voltage decreases to 146 kV. The maximum calculated arrester distance is 28.5 m, with an arriving voltage of 493 kV, maximum transformer voltage of 165 kV, arrester rated voltage of 132 kV, lightning surge impedance of 510 Ω, discharge current of 2.1 kA, and arrester resistance of 219.04 Ω. ETAP simulation results indicate significant waveform changes during lightning disturbances. The arrester's performance as an overvoltage protection device is considered reliable, especially with field installation at a distance of 5 m from the transformer, well within the calculated maximum protection range.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

W. Strielkowski, L. Civín, E. Tarkhanova, M. Tvaronavičienė, and Y. Petrenko, “Renewable Energy in the Sustainable Development of Electrical Power Sector: A Review,” Energies, vol. 14, no. 24, Art. no. 24, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.3390/en14248240.

Tumiran, L. M. Putranto, Sarjiya, F. D. Wijaya, A. Priyanto, and I. Savitri, “Generation Expansion Planning Based on Local Renewable Energy Resources: A Case Study of the Isolated Ambon-Seram Power System,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 5, Art. no. 5, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14053032.

M. G. M. Almihat, M. T. E. Kahn, K. Aboalez, and A. M. Almaktoof, “Energy and Sustainable Development in Smart Cities: An Overview,” Smart Cities, vol. 5, no. 4, Art. no. 4, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.3390/smartcities5040071.

M. Rajabnia et al., “Long-Term Renewable Energy Planning in the Indonesian Context: A Lombok Island Study Case,” Applied Sciences, vol. 13, no. 23, Art. no. 23, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.3390/app132312860.

J. M. Lopes, S. Gomes, and L. Mané, “Developing Knowledge of Supply Chain Resilience in Less-Developed Countries in the Pandemic Age,” Logistics, vol. 6, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.3390/logistics6010003.

S. Bandara, P. Rajeev, and E. Gad, “Power Distribution System Faults and Wildfires: Mechanisms and Prevention,” Forests, vol. 14, no. 6, Art. no. 6, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.3390/f14061146.

N. I. Ahmad, Z. Ali, M. Z. A. Ab. Kadir, M. Osman, N. H. Zaini, and M. H. Roslan, “Analysis of Lightning-Induced Voltages Effect with SPD Placement for Sustainable Operation in Hybrid Solar PV-Battery Energy Storage System,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 12, Art. no. 12, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13126889.

V. L. Mazzotti et al., “Secondary Transition Predictors of Postschool Success: An Update to the Research Base,” Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 47–64, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1177/2165143420959793.

T. Langer et al., “Prone position in intubated, mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19: a multi-centric study of more than 1000 patients,” Crit Care, vol. 25, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03552-2.

A. Mariscotti, “Assessment of Human Exposure (Including Interference to Implantable Devices) to Low-Frequency Electromagnetic Field in Modern Microgrids, Power Systems and Electric Transports,” Energies, vol. 14, no. 20, Art. no. 20, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.3390/en14206789.

S. Wang et al., “Study on the Measurement of the On-Site Overvoltage and Internal Temperature Rise Simulation of the EMU Arrester,” Applied Sciences, vol. 12, no. 15, Art. no. 15, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.3390/app12157925.

L. J. Damschroder, C. M. Reardon, M. A. Opra Widerquist, and J. Lowery, “Conceptualizing outcomes for use with the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR): the CFIR Outcomes Addendum,” Implementation Sci, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 7, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01181-5.

N. Duc-Tuong, “Research of the Atmospheric Overvoltages and Coordination Insulation in a Substation 220 Kv,” Dec. 31, 2024, Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY: 5077951. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.5077951.

S. Liu, L. Wang, S. Liu, Z. Liu, and Y. Geng, “Modeling and Experimental Validation on Current Uniformity Characteristics of Parallel Spiral Structure Surge Arrester in ±550 kV DC GIS,” Applied Sciences, vol. 14, no. 13, Art. no. 13, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.3390/app14135744.

J. Hu, T. Zhu, J. Hu, Z. Fang, and R. Zhang, “Study on the Lightning Protection Performance for a 110 kV Non-Shield-Wired Overhead Line with Anti-Thunder and Anti-Icing Composite Insulators,” Energies, vol. 16, no. 2, Art. no. 2, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.3390/en16020815.

A. H. K. Asadi, M. Eskandari, and H. Delavari, “Accurate Surge Arrester Modeling for Optimal Risk-Aware Lightning Protection Utilizing a Hybrid Monte Carlo–Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm,” Technologies, vol. 12, no. 6, Art. no. 6, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.3390/technologies12060088.

S. Zhang, Y. Fan, Q. Lei, J. Wang, Y. Liu, and T. Zhan, “Insulation structure design and electric field simulation of 500 kV isolation energy supply transformer for HVDC breaker,” High Voltage, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 185–196, 2022, doi: 10.1049/hve2.12102.

B. N. Gugulothu, S. Lakshminarayanan, M. Palati, S. Haleyur Lakshmegowda, and M. Bukya, “A practical case study on effect of moisture ingress in power cables and methods to reduce equipment failure,” Eng. Res. Express, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 015313, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1088/2631-8695/ada5a9.

N. V. Martyushev et al., “Review of Methods for Improving the Energy Efficiency of Electrified Ground Transport by Optimizing Battery Consumption,” Energies, vol. 16, no. 2, Art. no. 2, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.3390/en16020729.

S. Hardi, M. Rahmat, and E. P. Sinulingga, “Improved Quality of using Voltage Static Var Compensator and Capacitor Bank on the Transmission Line,” J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., vol. 1811, no. 1, p. 012066, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1811/1/012066.

F. Tesson et al., “Systematic and quantitative view of the antiviral arsenal of prokaryotes,” Nat Commun, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 2561, May 2022, doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-30269-9.

S. S. Rangarajan et al., “DC Microgrids: A Propitious Smart Grid Paradigm for Smart Cities,” Smart Cities, vol. 6, no. 4, Art. no. 4, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.3390/smartcities6040079.

J. M. Rodríguez-Serna, W. M. Villa-Acevedo, and J. M. López-Lezama, “External Multi-Gap Lightning Arrester Modeling Using the Integration Method,” Energies, vol. 17, no. 5, Art. no. 5, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.3390/en17051241.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-30

How to Cite

Heru Muhtari, Adel Salem Sultan, Ivan Pavkovic, Xianjie Feng, Shehab Abdulwadood Ali, Neli Velikova, & Yehia Sayed Mohamed. (2025). Analysis of Arrester Usage as Over Voltage Protection at 150 kV Mantang Substation, Indonesia. Frontier Advances in Applied Science and Engineering, 3(1), 28–39. https://doi.org/10.59535/faase.v3i1.426

Issue

Section

Original Articles