Improving Teacher Competence in Developing Love-Based Curriculum Teaching Tools through Artificial Intelligence-Assisted KKG at MIN 2 North Halmahera

Authors

  • Adiyana Adam Institut Agama Islam Negeri Ternate, Maluku Utara, Indonesia
  • Rosdiana Im Institut Agama Islam Negeri Ternate, Maluku Utara, Indonesia
  • Kartini Limatahu Institut Agama Islam Negeri Ternate, Maluku Utara, Indonesia
  • Irma Sapsuha Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Babussalam Sula, Maluku Utara, Indonesia
  • Azis Los'en Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Babussalam Sula, Maluku Utara, Indonesia
  • Erina Junaedi Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Babussalam Sula, Maluku Utara, Indonesia
  • Kamarun M Sebe Institut Agama Islam Negeri Ternate, Maluku Utara, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59535/sehati.v4i1.640

Keywords:

Love-Based Curriculum, Teacher Working Group, Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the improvement of teachers' competence in developing teaching materials for the Love-Based Curriculum through the activities of the Teacher Working Group assisted by Artificial Intelligence at MIN 2 North Halmahera. The study used a Classroom Action Research approach with a two-cycle design that includes the stages of planning, action implementation, observation, and reflection. Cycle I was positioned as a discovery mission to identify teachers' initial understanding and challenges in implementing the Love-Based Curriculum, while Cycle II functioned as an action change designed based on the results of the previous cycle's reflection. Data collection techniques included observation, interviews, and document analysis of teachers' teaching materials. Data were analyzed qualitatively through the processes of reduction, presentation, and drawing conclusions. The results showed that the activities of the Teacher Working Group assisted by Artificial Intelligence were able to significantly improve teachers' pedagogical competence. This improvement was evident in the shift in the practice of preparing teaching materials from administrative and declarative to a more operational, reflective learning design, and oriented towards the internalization of human values. Teachers demonstrated better abilities in integrating learning objectives, reflective activities, and holistic assessments in accordance with the principles of the Love-Based Curriculum. In addition, Artificial Intelligence was utilized more critically as a cognitive partner in learning planning. This study concludes that the synergy between the Love-Based Curriculum value framework, the teacher professional community, and the use of artificial intelligence technology plays a crucial role in teacher professional development in madrasah.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

J. M. Tsarapkina, A. V. Anisimova, B. D. Gadzhimetova, A. M. Kireycheva, and A. G. Mironov, “The impact of digital education transformation on technical college teachers,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 2001, no. 1, p. 012030, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/2001/1/012030.

M. Gisbert Cervera and F. Caena, “Teachers’ digital competence for global teacher education,” Eur. J. Teach. Educ., vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 451–455, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.1080/02619768.2022.2135855.

A. ElSayary, “An investigation of teachers’ perceptions of using ChatGPT as a supporting tool for teaching and learning in the digital era,” J. Comput. Assist. Learn., vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 931–945, 2024, doi: 10.1111/jcal.12926.

W. Wermke, R. Freier, and D. Nordholm, “Framing curriculum making: bureaucracy and couplings in school administration,” J. Curric. Stud., vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 562–579, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1080/00220272.2023.2251543.

N. Barrett-Maitland, E. Williams-Shakespeare, D. Allen, and S. Edwards-Braham, “From tradition to innovation: Proposing agile leadership as the new paradigm for a higher education institution in a developing country,” Power Educ., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 255–278, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.1177/17577438241307310.

M. Kholili, A. Izudin, and M. L. Hakim, “Islamic proselytizing in digital religion in Indonesia: the challenges of broadcasting regulation,” Cogent Soc. Sci., vol. 10, no. 1, p. 2357460, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1080/23311886.2024.2357460.

N. Chanifah, Y. Hanafi, C. Mahfud, and A. Samsudin, “Designing a spirituality-based Islamic education framework for young muslim generations: a case study from two Indonesian universities,” High. Educ. Pedagog., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 195–211, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1080/23752696.2021.1960879.

C. C. Borges et al., “Association between spirituality/religiousness and quality of life among healthy adults: a systematic review,” Health Qual. Life Outcomes, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 246, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01878-7.

Z. Madin et al., “Stimulating the Professional and Personal Self-Development of Future Teachers in the Context of Value-Semantic Orientation,” Educ. Res. Int., vol. 2022, no. 1, p. 8789773, 2022, doi: 10.1155/2022/8789773.

D. K. Morrison, “The Daxton Principle: A universal framework emphasizing self-awareness and high standards as the foundation for personal and societal transformation.,” Jan. 01, 2025, Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY: 5162169. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.5162169.

Y.-H. Shih, “Love-based relationships between teachers and students in early childhood education,” Policy Futur. Educ., vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 748–761, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1177/14782103211063050.

O. Gunnlaugson, R. Cueto de Souza, S. Zhao, A. Yee, C. Scott, and H. Bai, “Revisiting the Nature of Transformative Learning Experiences in Contemplative Higher Education,” J. Transform. Educ., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 84–101, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1177/15413446211067285.

H. Q. Chung, V. Chen, and C. B. Olson, “The impact of self-assessment, planning and goal setting, and reflection before and after revision on student self-efficacy and writing performance,” Read. Writ., vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 1885–1913, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11145-021-10186-x.

M. M. Ness, J. Saylor, L. A. Di Fusco, and K. Evans, “Healthcare providers’ challenges during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic: A qualitative approach,” Nurs. Health Sci., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 389–397, 2021, doi: 10.1111/nhs.12820.

D. Atkins et al., “Understanding Battery Interfaces by Combined Characterization and Simulation Approaches: Challenges and Perspectives,” Adv. Energy Mater., vol. 12, no. 17, p. 2102687, 2022, doi: 10.1002/aenm.202102687.

N. H. Jainal and M. Shahrill, “Incorporating Jigsaw Strategy to Support Students’ Learning through Action Research,” Int. J. Soc. Educ. Sci., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 252–266, 2021.

E. J. Austin et al., “A learning health systems approach to integrating electronic patient-reported outcomes across the health care organization,” Learn. Health Syst., vol. 5, no. 4, p. e10263, 2021, doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10263.

K. Crolla, J. Song, A. Bunica, and A. T. Sheikh, “Integrating Extended Reality in Architectural Design Studio Teaching and Reviews: Implementing a Participatory Action Research Framework,” Buildings, vol. 14, no. 6, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.3390/buildings14061865.

B. H. Ghahderijani, E. Namaziandost, M. Tavakoli, T. Kumar, and R. Magizov, “The comparative effect of group dynamic assessment (GDA) and computerized dynamic assessment (C-DA) on Iranian upper-intermediate EFL learners’ speaking complexity, accuracy, and fluency (CAF),” Lang. Test. Asia, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 25, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1186/s40468-021-00144-3.

H. Azam, “Unraveling the Dynamics: Understanding the Process of Students Learning in Classroom Management at Balkh University,” Sprin J. Arts Humanit. Soc. Sci., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 21–25, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.55559/sjahss.v3i2.237.

A. Nurjamin, D.-E. Salazar-Espinoza, N. Saenko, and E. Bina, “Learner-oriented assessment matters: testing the effects of academic buoyancy, reflective thinking, and learner enjoyment in self-assessment and test-taking anxiety management of the EFL learners,” Lang. Test. Asia, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 30, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1186/s40468-023-00247-z.

Y. Song and Q. Ma, “Affordances of a mobile learner-generated tool for pupils’ English as a second language vocabulary learning: An ecological perspective,” Br. J. Educ. Technol., vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 858–878, 2021, doi: 10.1111/bjet.13037.

G. Bammer et al., “Setting parameters for developing undergraduate expertise in transdisciplinary problem solving at a university-wide scale: a case study,” Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun., vol. 10, no. 1, p. 208, May 2023, doi: 10.1057/s41599-023-01709-8.

T. Wallenius and J. Varjo, “Challenges of collaborative governance in lifelong guidance in Finland,” Nord. J. Stud. Educ. Policy, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 19–28, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1080/20020317.2024.2379586.

F. Manes-Rossi, I. Brusca, R. L. Orelli, P. C. Lorson, and E. Haustein, “Features and drivers of citizen participation: Insights from participatory budgeting in three European cities,” Public Manag. Rev., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 201–223, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1080/14719037.2021.1963821.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-05

How to Cite

[1]
Adiyana Adam, “Improving Teacher Competence in Developing Love-Based Curriculum Teaching Tools through Artificial Intelligence-Assisted KKG at MIN 2 North Halmahera”, Soc. Econ. Hum. Aspects Town. Ind., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 44–55, Feb. 2026.