The Relationship between Human Freedom and Moral Responsibility Before God

Authors

  • Erlina Waruwu Sekolah Tinggi Teologi Anugerah Misi Nias Barat, Indonesia
  • Hati Nurani Gulo Sekolah Tinggi Teologi Anugerah Misi Nias Barat, Indonesia
  • Solidaritas Gulo Sekolah Tinggi Teologi Anugerah Misi Nias Barat, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59535/sehati.v4i1.639

Keywords:

Human Freedom, Moral Responsibility, Human-God Relationship, Systematic Theology, Theological Anthropology

Abstract

This article examines the relationship between human freedom and moral responsibility from a systematic theological perspective. Based on contemporary realities that demonstrate a tendency to understand human freedom autonomously and independently of divine authority, this study asserts that human freedom cannot be separated from moral responsibility before God. This research uses a qualitative method with a theological literature review approach and a conceptual analysis of Christian theological anthropological doctrine. The analysis is conducted through a synthesis of systematic theological thought on free will, sin, and moral responsibility to uncover the meaning of human freedom in its relationship with God as Creator and Arbiter of ethical norms. The results of the study indicate that human freedom is understood as a divine gift that is relational and theocentric, presupposing moral accountability for every human choice and action. Moral responsibility is not a limitation on freedom but rather an essential consequence of the freedom bestowed by God. The theological implications of this study emphasize the importance of a balanced understanding of freedom and responsibility in the lives of believers, so that freedom is exercised ethically, responsibly, and in harmony with God's will. This research is limited to a systematic theological literature review, thus opening opportunities for further biblical and empirical research within the context of church and community life.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

I. A. Charitos et al., “Stem Cells: A Historical Review about Biological, Religious, and Ethical Issues,” Stem Cells Int., vol. 2021, no. 1, p. 9978837, 2021, doi: 10.1155/2021/9978837.

D. G. Jones, “Religious Concerns About COVID-19 Vaccines: From Abortion to Religious Freedom,” J. Relig. Health, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 2233–2252, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10943-022-01557-x.

M. Dorobantu, “Artificial In℡ligence as a Testing Ground for Key Theological Questions,” Zygon®, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 984–999, 2022, doi: 10.1111/zygo.12831.

M. Björkmark, P. Nynäs, and C. Koskinen, “‘Living Between Two Different Worlds’: Experiences of Leaving a High-Cost Religious Group,” J. Relig. Health, vol. 61, no. 6, pp. 4721–4737, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10943-021-01397-1.

D. Ezzy, B. Fielder, A. Dwyer, and L. Richardson-Self, “LGBT+ equality, religious freedom and government-funded faith-based religiously affiliated educational workplaces,” Aust. J. Soc. Issues, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 185–201, 2022, doi: 10.1002/ajs4.195.

I. Jirásek, “Spiritual literacy: non-religious reconceptualisation for education in a secular environment,” Int. J. Child. Spiritual., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 61–75, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1080/1364436X.2023.2166467.

S. Altmeyer, “Religious education for ecological sustainability: an initial reality check using the example of everyday decision-making,” J. Relig. Educ., vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 57–74, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s40839-020-00131-5.

D. Carr, “Love, knowledge (wisdom) and justice: Moral education beyond the cultivation of Aristotelian virtuous character,” J. Moral Educ., vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 273–291, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1080/03057240.2023.2219029.

A. Visala, “How the Cognitive Sciences Might Contribute to the Theological Debate about Free Will,” Mod. Theol., vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 362–381, 2021, doi: 10.1111/moth.12687.

L. Launonen and R. T. Mullins, “Why Open Theism Is Natural and Classical Theism Is Not,” Religions, vol. 12, no. 11, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.3390/rel12110956.

A. Rasmusson, “Radical Orthodoxy on Catholicism, Protestantism and Liberalism/Liberality: On the Use of Historical Narratives and Quantitative Methods in Political Theology,” Mod. Theol., vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 44–61, 2021, doi: 10.1111/moth.12596.

M. Mukhibat, M. Effendi, W. H. Setyawan, and M. Sutoyo, “Development and evaluation of religious moderation education curriculum at higher education in Indonesia,” Cogent Educ., vol. 11, no. 1, p. 2302308, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2024.2302308.

E. Ongaro and M. Tantardini, “Bringing Religion into Public Value Theory and Practice: Rationale and Perspectives,” Adm. Soc., vol. 56, no. 8, pp. 972–1000, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.1177/00953997241264474.

J. Leidenhag, “The Challenge of Autism for Relational Approaches to Theological Anthropology,” Int. J. Syst. Theol., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 109–134, 2021, doi: 10.1111/ijst.12453.

M. Nicmanis, “Reflexive Content Analysis: An Approach to Qualitative Data Analysis, Reduction, and Description,” Int. J. Qual. Methods, vol. 23, p. 16094069241236603, May 2024, doi: 10.1177/16094069241236603.

M. C. Schlunegger, M. Zumstein-Shaha, and R. Palm, “Methodologic and Data-Analysis Triangulation in Case Studies: A Scoping Review,” West. J. Nurs. Res., vol. 46, no. 8, pp. 611–622, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.1177/01939459241263011.

C. Gómez-Vírseda and R. A. Usanos, “Relational autonomy: lessons from COVID-19 and twentieth-century philosophy,” Med. Health Care Philos., vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 493–505, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11019-021-10035-2.

S. Mhlambi and S. Tiribelli, “Decolonizing AI Ethics: Relational Autonomy as a Means to Counter AI Harms,” Topoi, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 867–880, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s11245-022-09874-2.

M. Bonotti and J. Seglow, “Freedom of speech: A relational defence,” Philos. Soc. Crit., vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 515–529, May 2022, doi: 10.1177/01914537211073782.

K. Laaser and S. Bolton, “Absolute autonomy, respectful recognition and derived dignity: Towards a typology of meaningful work,” Int. J. Manag. Rev., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 373–393, 2022, doi: 10.1111/ijmr.12282.

D. Kalsched, “Intersections of personal vs. collective trauma during the COVID-19 pandemic: the hijacking of the human imagination,” J. Anal. Psychol., vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 443–462, 2021, doi: 10.1111/1468-5922.12697.

S. Zahl, “Beyond the Critique of Soteriological Individualism: Relationality and Social Cognition,” Mod. Theol., vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 336–361, 2021, doi: 10.1111/moth.12686.

A. Jedličková, “Ethical approaches in designing autonomous and intelligent systems: a comprehensive survey towards responsible development,” AI Soc., vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 2703–2716, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.1007/s00146-024-02040-9.

P. D’Cruz, S. Du, E. Noronha, K. P. Parboteeah, H. Trittin-Ulbrich, and G. Whelan, “Technology, Megatrends and Work: Thoughts on the Future of Business Ethics,” J. Bus. Ethics, vol. 180, no. 3, pp. 879–902, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10551-022-05240-9.

R. Waelen and M. Wieczorek, “The Struggle for AI’s Recognition: Understanding the Normative Implications of Gender Bias in AI with Honneth’s Theory of Recognition,” Philos. Technol., vol. 35, no. 2, p. 53, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s13347-022-00548-w.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-05

How to Cite

[1]
Erlina Waruwu, Hati Nurani Gulo, and Solidaritas Gulo, “The Relationship between Human Freedom and Moral Responsibility Before God”, Soc. Econ. Hum. Aspects Town. Ind., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 56–64, Feb. 2026.

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Socio-Economic and Humanistic Aspects for Township and Industry

Section

Review Article

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Erlina Waruwu, Hati Nurani Gulo, Solidaritas Gulo

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

All articles published in Socio-Economic and Humanistic Aspects for Township and Industry (Sehati) are made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

Under this license:

  • You are free to:

    • Share — Copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
    • Adapt — Remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.

  • Under the following terms:

    • Attribution — You must give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and provide a link to the license. You must indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.