Leadership Style and Motivation on The Performance of Managers in The Youth of Nahdlatul Wathan Sumbawa Besar Organization
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59535/ijms.v3i2.624Keywords:
Leadership Style, Motivation, Managerial Performance, Youth of NW Sumbawa Besar OrganizationAbstract
Many youth organizations, including the Youth of Nahdlatul Wathan (NW) Sumbawa Besar Organization, struggle to optimize managerial performance due to mismatched leadership styles and low member motivation, which reduce operational effectiveness and productivity, underscoring the need to evaluate how leadership style impacts performance by improving motivation. This study aims to analyze the impact of leadership style on managerial performance, both directly and indirectly through motivation as a mediating variable. Using a quantitative approach, data were collected via a Likert scale-based questionnaire from 51 administrators in Sumbawa Besar Regency and analyzed using SEM-PLS. The results indicate that leadership style significantly affects managerial performance and notably boosts member motivation, which in turn enhances managerial performance. This finding confirms the mediating role of motivation in the relationship between leadership and performance. Therefore, the implementation of adaptive leadership styles and member empowerment is essential for improving the operational effectiveness of organizations. In the Youth of NW Sumbawa Besar Organization, motivation plays a vital role as a mediator that amplifies the influence of leadership style on managerial performance, extending its effects beyond direct impact. This finding has not been documented in prior studies concerning the Youth of NW Sumbawa Besar Organization. The implications of this study offer a practical framework for youth organization managers to create leadership training programs aimed at boosting motivation.
Downloads
References
S. Losch, E. Traut-Mattausch, M. D. Mühlberger, and E. Jonas, “Comparing the effectiveness of individual coaching, self-coaching, and group training: How leadership makes the difference,” Front. Psychol., vol. 7, no. MAY, pp. 1–17, 2016, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00629.
E. Yaakobi and J. Weisberg, “Individual, group and organizational efficacies in predicting performance,” Pers. Rev., vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 535–554, 2018, doi: 10.1108/pr-08-2016-0212.
M. Murniati and F. A. Siregar, “Principal Managerial Competence in Improving Organizational Performance,” Dev. Stud. Educ. Manag. Leadersh., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 75–84, 2022, doi: 10.47766/development.v1i1.530.
G. C. Saha et al., “Impact of the Combination of Managerial Efficiency and Effectiveness on an Organization,” J. Law Sustain. Dev., vol. 12, no. 6, p. e3633, 2024, doi: 10.55908/sdgs.v12i6.3633.
A. Dinn, F. Fakhruddin, and T. Suminar, “A Habituation Based Islamic Character Learning Management in MI Muhammadiyah 2 Kudus Program Khusus,” Educ. Manag., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 165–172, 2019.
S. Susmadiana, B. Lian, and Y. Puspita, “The Effect of Managerial Supervision and Work Motivation on Improving Principal’s Performance,” J. Soc. Work Sci. Educ., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 181–187, 2021, doi: 10.52690/jswse.v2i2.248.
Muh. A. Parhanudin, “Analysis Of Social Structure And Power Relations In NW Anjani Community,” Sophist J. Sos. Polit. Kaji. Islam Dan Tafsir, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–37, 2020, doi: 10.20414/sophist.v2i1.20.
A. Haris and Z. Arifin, “Peran Pemuda Nahdlatul Wathan dalam Meng-Counter Radikalisme dan Liberalisme dalam Mewujudkan Moderasi Beragama di Kabupaten Sumbawa,” Al-Munawwarah J. Pendidik. Islam, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 63–73, 2021.
A. Sujai, “Cultural Da’Wah Tuan Guru Kyai Haji. Muhammad Zainuddin Abdul Madjid (Concept, Management and Implementation in Nahdlatul Wathan Organization in Lombok, Ntb),” J. Syntax Transform., vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 40–52, 2023, doi: 10.46799/jst.v4i10.790.
L. Lamere, K. C. Kirana, and H. Welsa, “Analisis Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan dan Etos Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Melalui Motivasi Sebagai Variabel Intervening,” Bisma J. Manaj., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 341–349, 2021, doi: 10.37010/fcs.v2i1.291.
L. A. Guterres and W. G. Supartha, “Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan dan Motivasi Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Guru,” E-J. Ekon. Dan Bisnis Univ. Udayana, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 429–454, 2016.
W. Saputra and I. Wibowo, “Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan,” J. Manaj. Bisnis Krisnadwipayana, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1–19, 2017, doi: 10.34010/miu.v16i2.1361.
A. Prayudi, “Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan Transformasional Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Dengan Motivasi Kerja Sebagai Variabel Intervening (Studi Pada Karyawan Pd. Pembangunan Kota Binjai),” J. Manaj., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 63–72, 2020.
A. Tahar and M. A. Abdillah, “The Influence of Leadership Style on Managerial Performance of Village Governments with Motivation as Mediation,” J. Econ. Bus., vol. 4, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.31014/aior.1992.04.01.328.
T. T. Nguyen, L. Mia, L. Winata, and V. K. Chong, “Effect of transformational-leadership style and management control system on managerial performance,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 70, pp. 202–213, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.08.018.
R. Umami, “Pengaruh Partisipasi Penyusunan Anggaran, Gaya Kepemimpinan Dan Motivasi Terhadap Kinerja Manajerial Pada Rsj Tampan Provinsi Riau,” J. Akunt. Dan Keuang., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2020, doi: 10.32520/jak.v10i2.1787.
I. Hajiali, A. M. Fara Kessi, B. Budiandriani, E. Prihatin, M. M. Sufri, and A. Sudirman, “Determination of Work Motivation, Leadership Style, Employee Competence on Job Satisfaction and Employee Performance,” Gold. Ratio Hum. Resour. Manag., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 57–69, 2022, doi: 10.52970/grhrm.v2i1.160.
A. Arifuddin, W. Lita, S. Catherine, and S. Yingxiang, “The Influence of Leadership Style and Work Motivation on Employee Performance,” J. Markcount Finance, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 206–215, 2023, doi: 10.55849/jmf.v1i3.116.
N. A. Munawar and F. Hadiaty, “the Influence of Leadership Style on Employee Performance At Pt Adinda Permata Mulia,” J. ASIK J. Adm. Bisnis Ilmu Manaj. Kependidikan, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 585–607, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.38035/jafm.v5i4.
H. Hamdi, N. Aqmarina, A. Kadir, and N. Naimah, “The Effect of Leadership Style, Motivation and Work Discipline on Employee Performance,” JIMKES J. Ilm. Manaj. Kesehat., vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 2201–2212, 2024, doi: 10.55683/jrbee.v4i6.420.
Y. Barella, A. Fergina, M. K. Mustami, U. Rahman, and H. M. A. Alajaili, “Quantitative Methods in Scientific Research,” J. Pendidik. Sosiol. Dan Hum., vol. 15, no. 1, p. 281, 2024, doi: 10.26418/j-psh.v15i1.71528.
R. W. Emerson, “Likert scales,” J. Vis. Impair. Blind., vol. 111, no. 5, p. 488, 2017, doi: 10.1177/0145482X1711100511.
M. M. Mohamad, N. L. Sulaiman, L. C. Sern, and K. M. Salleh, “Measuring the Validity and Reliability of Research Instruments,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 204, no. August, pp. 164–171, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.129.
I. Hermawan, “Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan ( Kualitatif, Kuantitatif dan Mixed Method ),” Hidayatul Quran, 2019.
P. Bukit, F. R. Yamali, and R. Ananda, “Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai dengan Motivasi dan Disiplin Kerja Sebagai Variabel Intervening Pada Dinas Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat Provinsi Jambi,” J-MAS J. Manaj. Dan Sains, vol. 4, no. 2, p. 413, 2019, doi: 10.33087/jmas.v4i2.127.
S. Francois, M. Phanuel, R. Anselme, S. Ingabire, and N. Nepomuscene, “The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices On Public Institutions’ Performance: Case of Muhanga District, Rwanda,” Afr. Q. Soc. Sci. Rev., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 96–108, 2025, doi: 10.61801/ouaess.2022.2.94.
A. S. Nwannebuife, O. D. Chucks, O. O. Oluseye, and O. Onayemi, “Empirical Examination of Intrinsic Motivation as a Predictor of Organizational Productivity,” Int. J. Bus. Manag., vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 173–180, 2020, doi: 10.24940/theijbm/2020/v8/i9/bm2009-055.
L. Narindro, W. Hardyanto, T. J. Raharjo, and C. B. Utomo, “Analysis of Implementation of POAC Model and Management Information System for Academic Performance,” vol. 443, no. Iset 2019, pp. 493–497, 2020, doi: 10.2991/assehr.k.200620.097.
H. Hammouch, M. Falahat, and H. Najmi, “Impact of management control on the organizational performance,” J. Infrastruct. Policy Dev., vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 1–21, 2024, doi: 10.24294/jipd.v8i8.6910.
N. Hu, Z. Chen, J. Gu, S. Huang, and H. Liu, “Conflict and creativity in inter-organizational teams: The moderating role of shared leadership,” Int. J. Confl. Manag., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 74–102, 2017, doi: 10.1108/IJCMA-01-2016-0003.
J.-H. Cheah, M. Sarstedt, C. M. Ringle, T. Ramayah, and H. Ting, “Convergent validity assessment of formatively measured constructs in PLS-SEM,” Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag., vol. 30, no. 11, pp. 3192–3210, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1108/IJCHM-10-2017-0649.
W. Li and Y. F. Lay, “Examining the reliability and validity of measuring scales related to informatization and instructional leadership using the PLS-SEM approach,” Humanit. Soc. Sci. Lett., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 461–480, 2024, doi: 10.18488/73.v12i3.3789.
D. Sokolic, G. Croitoru, N. V. Florea, V. O. Robescu, and A. Cosac, “The Effect of Leadership Styles on Employee Motivation and Organizational Performance in Public Sector Organizations,” Valahian J. Econ. Stud., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 53–72, 2024, doi: 10.2478/vjes-2024-0005.
H. Hamsinah, “A Qualitative Examination of Leadership Styles and Their Impact on Employee Motivation in Indonesian Non-Profit Organizations,” Kontigensi J. Ilm. Manaj., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 169–175, 2024, doi: 10.56457/jimk.v12i1.547.
O. O. Akerele, “The Link between Motivation and Organizational Performance: An Exploration of Factors Influencing Employee Motivation and its Impact on Organizational Success,” Int. J. Bus. Ethics Gov., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 27–37, 2023, doi: 10.51325/ijbeg.v6i1.118.
U. Udin, R. D. Dharma, R. Dananjoyo, and M. Shaikh, “The Role of Transformational Leadership on Employee Performance Through Organizational Learning Culture and Intrinsic Work Motivation,” Int. J. Sustain. Dev. Plan., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 237–246, 2023, doi: 10.18280/ijsdp.180125.
C. F. Pazetto, T. T. Luiz, and I. M. Beuren, “Empowering leadership for contextual performance: serial mediation of organizational support and commitment,” Int. J. Product. Perform. Manag., 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/ijppm-04-2022-0195.
dan Dwirandra. Amertadewi., “Pengaruh Partisipasi Anggaran terhadap Kinerja Manajerial dengan Gaya Kepemimpinan dan Locus of Control sebagai Variabel Moderasi,” E-J. Akunt. Univ. Udayana, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 550–566, 2013.
Z. E. Putri, “Pengaruh Partisipasi Anggaran, Komitmen Organisasi, Gaya Kepemimpinan Terhadap Kinerja Manajerial,” Esensi, vol. 4, no. 3, 2014, doi: 10.15408/ess.v4i3.2439.
M. Frangieh and D. Rusu, “The Effect of the Carrot and Stick Transactional Leadership style in Motivating Employees in SMEs,” Rev. Int. Comp. Manag., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 242–252, 2021, doi: 10.24818/RMCI.2021.2.242.
M. K. Rabiul and T. F. Yean, “Leadership styles, motivating language, and work engagement: An empirical investigation of the hotel industry,” Int. J. Hosp. Manag., vol. 92, no. March 2020, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102712.
T. W. Maduretno and L. Fajri, “The effect of optimization learning resource based on Planning, Organizing, Actuating, Controlling (POAC) on contextual learning to students’ conceptual understanding of motion and force material,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1171, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1171/1/012012.
B. S. Nugroho et al., “Effect of organizational citizenship behavior, work satisfaction and organizational commitment toward indonesian school performance,” Syst. Rev. Pharm., vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 962–971, 2020, doi: 10.31838/srp.2020.9.140.
T. K. Maran, U. Baldegger, and K. Klösel, “Turning visions into results: unraveling the distinctive paths of leading with vision and autonomy to goal achievement,” Leadersh. Organ. Dev. J., vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 133–154, 2022, doi: 10.1108/LODJ-06-2021-0268.
N. Li, X. Zheng, B. B. Harris, X. Liu, and B. L. Kirkman, “Recognizing ‘me’ benefits ‘We’: Investigating the positive spillover effects of formal individual recognition in teams,” J. Appl. Psychol., vol. 101, no. 7, pp. 925–939, 2016, doi: 10.1037/apl0000101.
L. Eaton, T. Bridgman, and S. Cummings, “Advancing the democratization of work: A new intellectual history of transformational leadership theory,” Leadership, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 125–143, 2024, doi: 10.1177/17427150241232705.
M. Megawati, A. Hamdat, and N. Aida, “Examining Linkage Leadership Style, Employee Commitment, Work Motivation, Work Climate on Satisfaction and Performance,” Gold. Ratio Hum. Resour. Manag., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 01–14, 2022, doi: 10.52970/grhrm.v2i1.86.
E. Wuryani, A. F. Rodli, S. Sutarsi, N. N. Dewi, and D. Arif, “Analysis of decision support system on situational leadership styles on work motivation and employee performance,” Manag. Sci. Lett., no. January, pp. 365–372, 2021, doi: 10.5267/j.msl.2020.9.033.
B. Bronkhorst, B. Stejin, and B. Vermeeren, “Transformational Leadership, Goal Setting, and Work Motivation,” Rev. Public Pers. Adm., vol. 35, no. 2, p. 22, 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X13515486.
A. Shahid, “Employee Intention to Stay: An Environment Based on Trust and Motivation,” J. Manag. Res., vol. 10, no. 4, p. 58, 2018, doi: 10.5296/jmr.v10i4.13680.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Listiyana Listiyana, Djoko Soelistya, Odigbo Ikechukwu Aloysius, Amiruddin Ismail

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Djoko Soelistya, Endale Asrat, The Influence of Academic Supervision and Infrastructure on Teacher Performance: Exploring the Mediating Role of Teacher Competence , International Journal of Management Science: Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): January-June






