Analysis of Differences in Graph Interpretation Understanding of Grade X Students of Madrasah Aliyah Negeri (MAN) 1 Malang on Kinematics Topic Based on Gender

Nora Anggraini; Muhammad Reyza Arief Taqwa; Chusnana Insjaf Yogihati; Grace Djan

doi:10.59535/es.v2i1.294

Authors

Nora Anggraini Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Malang, Jl. Semarang 5, Malang, 65145, Indonesia
Muhammad Reyza Arief Taqwa Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Malang, Jl. Semarang 5, Malang, 65145, Indonesia
Chusnana Insjaf Yogihati Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Malang, Jl. Semarang 5, Malang, 65145, Indonesia
Grace Djan The Faculty of Natural Sciences, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59535/es.v2i1.294

Keywords:

Concept Understanding, Graph Interpretation, Kinematics, Gender

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the conception profile of MAN 1 Malang students on the subject matter of kinematics based on gender using multiple choice tests. The type of research used is quantitative descriptive research. This research was conducted on 94 students (47 male and 47 female students) of MAN 1 Malang. Quantitative data was obtained from the score of correct answers from students when answering questions. The method used was survey method. After the validation test and reliability test, there were 20 questions categorized as valid and could be used for research. The questions that passed the test were then given to students to do in the form of a written test. The results showed that students' understanding of the concept of kinematics was categorized as very low. This is due to the average student concept understanding score of 24.04. Based on the data analysis that has been done, it is concluded that there is no difference in concept understanding between male students and female students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

S. N. Anasi, ‘Perceived influence of work relationship, work load and physical work environment on job satisfaction of librarians in South-West, Nigeria’, Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, vol. 69, no. 6/7, pp. 377–398, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1108/GKMC-11-2019-0135.

M. J. Carreño, J. C. Castro-Alonso, and M. J. Gallardo, ‘Interest in Physics After Experimental Activities with a Mobile Application: Gender Differences’, Int J of Sci and Math Educ, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 1841–1857, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10763-021-10228-4.

D. F. Donnelly-Hermosillo, L. F. Gerard, and M. C. Linn, ‘Impact of graph technologies in K-12 science and mathematics education’, Computers & Education, vol. 146, p. 103748, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103748.

D. Fuadi, B. Sumardjoko, M. Novitasari, E. Inugati, A. Saputra, and D. S. Pratiwi, ‘Discipline Factor and the Impact on Mathematics Learning Outcomes in Vocational High Schools’, in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, IOP Publishing, 2021, p. 012003.

M. Y. R. T. Kawuri, I. Ishafit, and S. Fayanto, ‘Efforts to improve the learning activity and learning outcomes of physics students with using a problem-based learning model’, IJIS Edu: Indonesian Journal of Integrated Science Education, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 105–114, 2019.

E. Puspitaningtyas, S. Hasanah, S. Kusairi, and E. Purwaningsih, ‘Physics students’ responses when asked to select and solve motion kinematics problems in various representations’, AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 2330, no. 1, p. 050002, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1063/5.0043437.

B. Radulović, O. Zajkov, S. Gegovska-Zajkova, M. Stojanović, and J. Sliško, ‘A Cross-Country Comparison of Students’ Graphs Understanding and Perceived Mental Effort’, Mathematics, vol. 10, no. 14, Art. no. 14, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.3390/math10142428.

R. Winata and R. N. Friantini, ‘Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Matematika Siswa Ditinjau Dari Minat Belajar Dan Gender’, AlphaMath: Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 6, no. 1, p. [1-18], 2020.

E. Burkholder and S. Salehi, ‘Exploring the pre-instruction gender gap in physics’, PLOS ONE, vol. 17, no. 7, p. e0271184, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271184.

V. R. Riani, L. H. Sa’diyah, M. G. Purwanto, T. R. Ramalis, and A. Samsudin, ‘Assessing graph interpretation of high school students: an examination by students’ gender’, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., vol. 1806, no. 1, p. 012011, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012011.

R. P. Núñez, A. A. G. Suárez, and W. R. A. Castro, ‘Interpreting the slope of a straight line in kinematics graphs with school students’, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., vol. 2163, no. 1, p. 012011, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/2163/1/012011.

P. Klein et al., ‘Visual attention while solving the test of understanding graphs in kinematics: an eye-tracking analysis’, Eur. J. Phys., vol. 41, no. 2, p. 025701, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.1088/1361-6404/ab5f51.

T. Suganda, S. Kusairi, N. Azizah, and P. Parno, ‘The Correlation of Isomorphic, Open-Ended, and Conventional Score on the Ability to Solve Kinematics Graph Questions’, Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, vol. 6, no. 2, Art. no. 2, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.21009/1.06204.

P. J. S. dos Santos and T. F. M. dos Santos, ‘Analysis of a didactic sequence using educational robotics to teach graphs in kinematics’, Phys. Educ., vol. 56, no. 1, p. 015015, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1088/1361-6552/abc8fb.

S. Brückner, J. Schneider, O. Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, and H. Drachsler, ‘Epistemic Network Analyses of Economics Students’ Graph Understanding: An Eye-Tracking Study’, Sensors, vol. 20, no. 23, Art. no. 23, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.3390/s20236908.

S. Brückner, O. Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, S. Küchemann, P. Klein, and J. Kuhn, ‘Changes in Students’ Understanding of and Visual Attention on Digitally Represented Graphs Across Two Domains in Higher Education: A Postreplication Study’, Front. Psychol., vol. 11, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02090.

C. A. Hernández, R. P. Núñez, and A. A. Gamboa, ‘Gains in active learning of physics: a measurement applying the test of understanding graphs of kinematics’, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., vol. 2073, no. 1, p. 012003, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/2073/1/012003.

D. Hestenes and M. Wells, ‘A mechanics baseline test’, The physics teacher, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 159–166, 1992.

F. S. Hilyana and T. Khotimah, ‘Analysis of Student Activities in E-learning Based on Multiple Intelligences’, in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, IOP Publishing, 2021, p. 012054.

K. L. Loverro, T. N. Brown, M. E. Coyne, and J. M. Schiffman, ‘Use of body armor protection with fi ghting load impacts soldier performance and kinematics’, Applied Ergonomics, vol. 46, pp. 168–175, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2014.07.015.

M. George, ‘In vitro anticancer and antitubercular activities of cellulose-magnetite nanocomposite synthesized using deep eutectic solvent as a dispersant’, Journal of Materials NanoScience, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2021.

N. D. Setyani, J. Handhika, and C. Cari, ‘Analisis Kesalahan Mahasiswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Multirepresentasi pada Materi Kinematika dan Dinamika’, in Prosiding SNPF (Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Fisika), 2016.

J. Adams, H. T. Khan, R. Raeside, and D. I. White, Research methods for graduate business and social science students. SAGE publications India, 2007.

M. Ali, ‘Analisis miskonsepsi siswa berdasarkan gender dalam pembelajaran fisika dengan menggunakan tes diagnostik two-tier di kotabaru’, Cendekia: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 59–66, 2019.

S. Collado, J. Barrientos, and M. Ruiz Zúñiga, ‘The embodied musicality of hetero-cisgender violence: an analysis strategy to study mental health problems from a narrative-dialogic perspective’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 1–28, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1080/14780887.2022.2136553.

N. P. A. Larasati, ‘Gender inequality in Indonesia: Facts and legal analysis’, Law Research Review Quarterly, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 445–458, 2021.

D. Sugiyono, ‘Metode penelitian kuatintatif, kualitatif dan R & D/Sugiyono’, Bandung: Alfabeta, vol. 15, no. 2010, 2018.

M. B. Miles, A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldana, ‘Qualitative Data Analysis, A Methods Sourcebook (Fourth)’, Arizona State University, 2019.

X. Yang, Y. He, S. Shao, J. S. Baker, B. István, and Y. Gu, ‘Gender Differences in Kinematic Analysis of the Lower Limbs during the Chasse Step in Table Tennis Athletes’, Healthcare, vol. 9, no. 6, Art. no. 6, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.3390/healthcare9060703.

Z. Bańkosz, S. Winiarski, and I. Malagoli Lanzoni, ‘Gender Differences in Kinematic Parameters of Topspin Forehand and Backhand in Table Tennis’, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 17, no. 16, Art. no. 16, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165742.

M. Agirbasli, H. F. Dilek, M. A. Tatlisu, and H. Ankarali, ‘Reliability of normative tables in assessing elevated blood pressure in children’, J Hum Hypertens, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 241–247, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.1038/s41371-019-0290-z.

J. T. Kárász, K. Széll, and S. Takács, ‘Closed formula of test length required for adaptive testing with medium probability of solution’, Quality Assurance in Education, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 637–651, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1108/QAE-03-2023-0042.

D. Guffanti, A. Brunete, and M. Hernando, ‘Non-Invasive Multi-Camera Gait Analysis System and its Application to Gender Classification’, IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 95734–95746, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2995474.

V. W. S. Yun, N. M. Ulang, and S. H. Husain, ‘Measuring the Internal Consistency and Reliability of the Hierarchy of Controls in Preventing Infectious Diseases on Construction Sites: The Kuder-Richardson (KR-20) and Cronbach’s Alpha’, Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology, vol. 33, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.37934/araset.33.1.392405.

O. Tavasoli and M. Ghazavi, ‘Wave propagation and ground vibrations due to non-uniform cross-sections piles driving’, Computers and Geotechnics, vol. 104, pp. 13–21, 2018.

M. R. A. Taqwa, A. Suyudi, F. Sulman, and R. Faizah, ‘Kinematics students’ conceptual understanding in mathematical and visual representations: Is it different?’, AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 2569, no. 1, p. 050005, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1063/5.0112656.

Z. Mao, A. D. Jagtap, and G. E. Karniadakis, ‘Physics-informed neural networks for high-speed flows’, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 360, p. 112789, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2019.112789.

A. Nurani, A. T. Fatimah, and A. M. Ruswana, ‘Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Matematis Siswa Ditinjau dari Perbedaan Gender Melalui Pembelajaran Pendidikan Matematika Realistik (PMR)’, J-KIP (Jurnal Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan), vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 10–16, 2020.

A. J. Hawkins, D. B. Fox, D. L. Koch, M. W. Becker, and J. W. Tester, ‘Predictive Inverse Model for Advective Heat Transfer in a Short-Circuited Fracture: Dimensional Analysis, Machine Learning, and Field Demonstration’, Water Resources Research, vol. 56, no. 11, p. e2020WR027065, 2020, doi: 10.1029/2020WR027065.

M. Khasanah, R. E. Utami, and R. Rasiman, ‘Analisis kemampuan pemahaman konsep matematis siswa SMA berdasarkan gender’, Imajiner: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 347–354, 2020.