Peer Review Process
All papers are fully peer-reviewed. We only publish articles that have been reviewed and approved by highly qualified researchers with expertise in a field appropriate for the article. We used single blind peer-reviewing process. Detailed information about the flow for the manuscript submission (author) to the acceptance by editor is shown in the following figure.
-
Submission: Authors submit their manuscript to the journal editor via an online submission system or email.
-
Desk review: The journal editor conducts an initial review of the submitted manuscript to evaluate its suitability for the journal's focus and criteria and to ensure that it meets academic and ethical standards of writing.
-
Reviewer assignment: The editor assigns at least two reviewers who are experts in the relevant field to conduct the review.
-
Review: Reviewers evaluate the manuscript and provide feedback on its quality, originality, methodology, conclusions, and presentation. They also provide suggestions for improvement and further development of the manuscript.
-
Revision: Authors make revisions to the manuscript based on the reviewer's comments and resubmit it to the editor.
-
Editorial decision: The editor evaluates the manuscript and review results and decides whether to accept, reject, or request further revision.
-
Publication: If accepted, the manuscript is published in the journal and made available for reading and citation by researchers and scholars.
The peer review process is a critical step in ensuring the quality and integrity of scientific publications and ensuring that published articles have undergone rigorous evaluation by experts in the field.
