Future Tecno-Science Publisher
In Collaboration with:
Society:
Ikatan Pesantren Indonesia
Institution:
Institut Elkatarie
Article Readiness Level Testing
Article Readiness Level Testing (ARLT)
Use this self-check before submission. Select a score per criterion (Strong / Fair / Poor), sum to obtain your ARLT score (0–100), then see the Readiness Bands for next actions.
A) ARLT Rubric
| Criterion | Strong | Fair | Poor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Title — Clear, specific, and accurately reflects content. | 5 | 3 | 1 |
| Abstract — One paragraph; problem, purpose, method, key findings, implications; 5–6 single-word keywords. | 5 | 3 | 1 |
| Keywords — Searchable, represent intent; 5–6 single words (not phrases). | 5 | 3 | 1 |
| Introduction — Context & significance; clear gap; explicit objective/contribution (no separate literature review section required). | 15 | 10 | 5 |
| Method — Design, data, variables, and procedures are clear and replicable; align with objectives. | 15 | 10 | 5 |
| Results — Data presentation is accurate and readable; tables/figures are properly labelled and cited in-text. | 15 | 10 | 5 |
| Discussion — Interprets findings, explains mechanisms, and situates results against prior work; outlines implications. | 15 | 10 | 5 |
| Conclusion — Concise, aligned with objectives; states key takeaways and limitations/future work. | 10 | 6 | 3 |
| References (IEEE) — Accountable, mostly primary & recent (~80% within 10 years); IEEE style consistent; DOIs/URLs included where available. | 10 | 6 | 3 |
| Ethics & Transparency — COI/Funding declared; data/code availability stated (where applicable); approvals/permissions noted. | 10 | 6 | 3 |
| Total (max) | 100 | 67 | 32 |
B) How to Use
- Assign one score (Strong / Fair / Poor) per criterion.
- Sum all points to get your ARLT score (0–100).
- Use the bands below to plan revisions or proceed to submission.
C) Readiness Bands
| Score | Interpretation & Actions |
|---|---|
| 81–100 | High readiness. Finalise formatting and IEEE references; submit. |
| 65–80 | Moderate readiness. Minor edits likely—tighten Introduction/Discussion; ensure data transparency; proofread. |
| 50–64 | Borderline. Major revision recommended—clarify gap & methods; improve result presentation; add recent primary sources. |
| 0–49 | Low readiness. Redesign the manuscript (aim, method, coherence) before reattempting submission. |
Tip: Use Calibri 11 pt, single spacing, and place tables/figures in-text at first mention. Follow IEEE citations and provide DOIs/URLs where available.





