Analysis of Students Concept Mastery on Forces on Objects in Static Fluid with Interactive Demonstration Learning

Authors

  • Widya Rohmawati Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Malang, Jl. Semarang No 5, Kota Malang, Jawa Timur, Indonesia
  • Sutopo Sutopo Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Malang, Jl. Semarang No 5, Kota Malang, Jawa Timur, Indonesia
  • Bruce Waldrip Faculty of Education, University of Tasmania, Launceston, 7250, Australia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8001-4768
  • Mehmet Altan Kurnaz Department of Primary Education, Faculty of Education, Kastamonu University, Kastamonu, Turkey https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2824-4077
  • Sharona T. Levy Faculty of Education, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5621-5372

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59535/care.v2i2.323

Keywords:

Concept Mastery, Interactive Demonstration, Archimedes' Law

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the improvement of concept mastery of grade XI students about forces on objects in static fluid after being given interactive demonstration learning. The research method used is mixed method-embedded experimental design with one-group pretest-posttest design. The research subjects were students of class 4KJ SMK Universiti Malaysia and class H3 SMA Negeri 5 Malang. The instruments used were concept mastery test items regarding forces on objects in static fluid in the form of reasoned multiple choice questions, observation sheets, and interview guidelines. The results showed that the calculation of the d-effect size value of the learning applied to students of SMK Taman Universiti and SMAN 5 Malang was 4.50 and 4.28. The value of increasing student learning outcomes through the calculation of the average normalized gain is 0.88 and 0.83. The results also show that students can integrate Newton's laws in analyzing the problems of Archimedes' law after the learning is applied. For future research, similar learning can be applied to improve students concept mastery on other physics materials.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A. Aprilia and D. Aminatun, ‘Investigating Memory Loss: How Depression Affects Students’ Memory Endurance’, Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–11, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.33365/jeltl.v3i1.1719.

E. Puspitaningtyas and E. Purwaningsih, ‘Analysis of teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) and students’ conceptual mastery in static fluids’, AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 2330, no. 1, p. 050003, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1063/5.0043268.

L. Sukariasih, Sutopo, S. K. Handayanto, and A. M. Panre, ‘Students’ Reasoning About Float, Suspend, and Sink: The Role of Newton’s Laws’, Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, vol. 13, no. 2, Art. no. 2, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.15294/vz6qxm52.

M. A. Martawijaya, S. Rahmadhanningsih, A. Swandi, M. Hasyim, and E. H. Sujiono, ‘The Effect of Applying the Ethno-STEM-Project-based Learning Model on Students’ Higher-order Thinking Skill and Misconception of Physics Topics Related to Lake Tempe, Indonesia’, Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, vol. 12, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.15294/jpii.v12i1.38703.

G. Termini, ‘Pedagogical approaches to surface phenomena in liquids: Investigation-based laboratory and modelling activities to improve students’ learning’, Jun. 2023, Accessed: Dec. 09, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://tesidottorato.depositolegale.it/handle/20.500.14242/172206

C.-C. Liu et al., ‘Augmenting the effect of virtual labs with “teacher demonstration” and “student critique” instructional designs to scaffold the development of scientific literacy’, Instr Sci, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 303–333, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11251-021-09571-4.

A. Maatita, A. Arrijani, and A. Yalindua, ‘Effectiveness of the application of the Group Investigation (GI) learning model method of people tutors using e-learning via online and offline in increasing learning outcome of IPA for class VIIIA students at public middle school 2 Tutuyan East Bolaang Mongondow district’, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., vol. 1968, no. 1, p. 012003, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1968/1/012003.

M. Saputri, M. Syukri, and Elisa, ‘Analysis of momentum and impulse on students’ creative thinking skill through project based learning integrated STEM (science, technology, engineering, mathematics)’, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., vol. 2193, no. 1, p. 012066, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/2193/1/012066.

L. Haslam-Larmer, C. Donnelly, M. Auais, K. Woo, and V. DePaul, ‘Early mobility after fragility hip fracture: a mixed methods embedded case study’, BMC Geriatr, vol. 21, no. 1, p. 181, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02083-3.

S. C. Pan and S. K. Carpenter, ‘Prequestioning and Pretesting Effects: a Review of Empirical Research, Theoretical Perspectives, and Implications for Educational Practice’, Educ Psychol Rev, vol. 35, no. 4, p. 97, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10648-023-09814-5.

Z. Nufus, Mutiarani, and Sarwenda, ‘The Effect of Rosetta Stone Application on Student’s English Reading Comprehension’, EDUCATE : Journal of Education and Culture, vol. 1, no. 03, Art. no. 03, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.61493/educate.v1i03.91.

S. Susilawati, B. A. Kusumayati, S. Sutrio, and A. Doyan, ‘Effectiveness of Learning Devices Based on Conceptual Change Model to Improve Concept Mastery of Students in the Gas Kinetic Theory Material’, Journal of Science and Science Education, vol. 3, no. 2, Art. no. 2, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.29303/jossed.v3i2.2574.

I. Wenas, N. V. F. Liando, and R. Rorimpandey, ‘Task Based Learning as an Active Retrieval Approach in the Perception of EFL Students: A Case Study at Bridge Education Manado’, Journal of English Culture, Language, Literature and Education, vol. 11, no. 2, Art. no. 2, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.53682/eclue.v11i2.6417.

N. R. Moşteanu, ‘Teaching and Learning Techniques for the Online Environment. How to Maintain Students’ Attention and Achieve Learning Outcomes in a Virtual Environment Using New Technology’, ijirss, vol. 4, no. 4, Art. no. 4, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.53894/ijirss.v4i4.298.

C. Müller and T. Mildenberger, ‘Facilitating flexible learning by replacing classroom time with an online learning environment: A systematic review of blended learning in higher education’, Educational Research Review, vol. 34, p. 100394, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100394.

V. P. Coletta and J. J. Steinert, ‘Why normalized gain should continue to be used in analyzing preinstruction and postinstruction scores on concept inventories’, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res., vol. 16, no. 1, p. 010108, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.010108.

Y. Gao, X. Zhai, Y. Cui, T. Xin, and O. Bulut, ‘Re-validating a Learning Progression of Buoyancy for Middle School Students: A Longitudinal Study’, Res Sci Educ, vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 1761–1789, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11165-021-10021-x.

P. P. S. Dita, Murtono, S. Utomo, and D. A. Sekar, ‘Implementation of Problem Based Learning (PBL) on Interactive Learning Media’, Journal of Technology and Humanities, vol. 2, no. 2, Art. no. 2, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.53797/jthkkss.v2i2.4.2021.

Lestari et al., ‘Hybrid learning on problem-solving abiities in physics learning: A literature review’, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., vol. 1796, no. 1, p. 012021, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1796/1/012021.

Y. P. Yani, H. Hardeli, B. Oktavia, and D. Kurniawati, ‘The Development of an Integrated E-Module of Scientific Literacy and Video Demonstration Using a Problem-Based Learning Model for High School Students on Acids and Bases’, Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, vol. 8, no. 2, Art. no. 2, 2022, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v8i2.1306.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-12

How to Cite

Widya Rohmawati, Sutopo Sutopo, Bruce Waldrip, Kurnaz , M. A., & Sharona T. Levy. (2024). Analysis of Students Concept Mastery on Forces on Objects in Static Fluid with Interactive Demonstration Learning. Classroom Experiences, 2(2), 69–77. https://doi.org/10.59535/care.v2i2.323

Issue

Section

Articles